Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft; United States v. Headley

1. Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft (9th Cir. Mar. 18, 2010) (denying en banc review)

As you may recall, a Ninth Circuit panel previously refused to dismiss a civil suit against former Attorney General John Ashcroft involving allegations that Ashcroft directed the use of the material witness statute to carry out arrests in violation of the 4th Amendment. Over an 8-judge dissent, the full Ninth Circuit has now denied en banc review of that decision. The dissenting opinions, as well as a concurrence in the denial responding to them, are posted here: http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/03/18/06-36059.pdf

2. United States v. David Headley (N.D. Ill. Mar. 18, 2010)

David Headley has pled guilty to a number of charges relating to both the Mumbai attacks and a plot to attack the offices of a newspaper in Denmark. Details here: http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/March/10-ag-277.html

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: