February 24, 2010
* Upcoming Events
First, the ABA SCOLANS breakfast program series continues on both March 3 and March 16, both dates from 8:00-9:00 a.m. at the University Club in DC.
On March 3 the guest speaker is Professor David Cole, Georgetown Law School, who delivered the oral argument for the plaintiffs in Holder v. HLP. Please RSVP BY FEB. 26 (see the attached form). You may pay at the door.
On March 16 the guest speaker is Harold Koh, Legal Advisor, U.S. Department of State. He will address the “The Role of Law in the Obama Administration’s National Security Policy.” See attached RSVP form.
Second, the annual Duke University Center on Law, Ethics, and National Security conference will take place this year on April 15 and 16, at Duke.
The theme this year is “National Security Challenges and the Obama Administration,” and a letter of invitation, program and registration form are attached.
Breakfast H. Koh March 16 2010.pdf
Cole Registration Form.pdf
Dear Colleague letter for 2010.pdf
2010springconferenceprogram as of 2-17-10(4 pages).doc
2010_Regular Registration Form.doc
February 24, 2010
1. Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (S.Ct. oral argument was held yesterday)
This is the suit challenging the constitutionality of 18 USC 2339B (the 1996 material support statute). Oral argument was yesterday. For more insight, check out the brief podcasts (one by Peter Margulies of Roger Williams in defense of the statute, one by David Cole of Georgetown attacking the statute) provided by SCOTUSblog: http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/02/podcasts-holder-v-humanitarian-law-project/
2. More GTMO transfers
One unidentified GTMO detainee has just been transferred to Spain. Three (Saleh Bin Hadi Asasi, a native of Tunisia, Sharif Fati Ali al Mishad, a native of Egypt, and Abdul Rauf Omar Mohammad Abu al Qusin, a native of Libya) have just been sent to Albania. 188 detainees remain at GTMO.
3. Forthcoming Scholarship
“National Security Case Studies: Special Case-Management Challenges”
Robert Timothy Reagan
Federal Judicial Center
National security cases often pose unusual and challenging case-management issues for the courts. Evidence or arguments may be classified; witnesses or the jury may require special security measures; attorneys contacts with their clients may be diminished; other challenges may present themselves. The purpose of this Federal Judicial Center resource is to assemble methods federal judges have employed to meet these challenges so that judges facing the challenges can learn from their colleagues experiences. These case studies include background factual information about a selection of national security cases as well as descriptions of the judges challenges and solutions.The information presented is based on a review of case files and news media accounts and on interviews with the judges. Read the rest of this entry »